| 1. |
Ishikawa, K. (1986) Guide to quality control, Productivity, Inc., Shelton, CT. See also, http://www.hci.com.au/hcisite2/toolkit/causeand/htm.
|
| |
| 2. |
Lam, R. L. H., Welch, W. J., and Young, S. S. (2002) Uniform coverage designs for molecule selection. Technometrics
44, 99–109.
|
| |
| 3. |
Hawkins, D. M., Young, S. S., and Rusinko, A. (1997) Analysis of a large structure-activity data set using recursive partitioning.
Quantitaive Structure-Activity Relationship
16, 296–302.
|
| |
| 4. |
Rusinko, A. III, Farmen, M. W., Lambert, C. G., Brown, P. L., and Young, S. S. (1999) Analysis of a large structure/biological
activity data set using recursive partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
39, 1017–1026.
|
| |
| 5. |
van Rhee, A. M., Stocker, J., Printzenhoff, D., Creeh, C., Wagoner, P. K., and Spear, K. L. (2001) Retrospective analysis
of an experimental high-throughput screening data set by recursive partitioning. J. Comb. Chem.
3, 267–277.
|
| |
| 6. |
Abt, M., Lim, Y-B., Sacks, J., Xie, M., and Young, S. S. (2001) A sequential approach for identifying lead compounds in large
chemical databases. Stat. Sci.
16, 154–168.
|
| |
| 7. |
Engels, M. F., and Venkatarangan, P. (2001) Smart screening: approaches to efficient HTS. Current Opinion Drug Discovery & Development
4, 275–283.
|
| |
| 8. |
Xu, J. and Hagler, A. (2002) Review: chemoinformatics and drug discovery. Molecules
7, 566–600.
|
| |
| 9. |
Hawkins, D. M. and Kass, G. V. (1982) Automatic interaction detection. In Topics in applied multivariate analysis, Hawkins, D. M. (ed.), Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 269–302.
|
| |
| 10. |
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. A., and Stone, C. J. (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, New York, NY.
|
| |
| 11. |
Quinlan, J. R. (1992) C4.5 programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.
|
| |
| 12. |
Burden, F. R. (1989) Molecular identification number for substructure searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
29, 225–227.
|
| |
| 13. |
Pearlman, R. S. and Smith, K. M. (1999) Metric validation and the receptor-relevant subspace concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
39, 28–35.
|
| |
| 14. |
Westfall, P. H. and Young, S. S. (1993) Resampling-based multiple testing. Wiley, New York, NY.
|
| |
| 15. |
Hawkins, D. M. and Musser, B. J. (1999) One tree or a forest? Alternative dendrographic models. Computing Science and Statistics
30, 534–542
|
| |
| 16. |
FIRMPlus® http://www.goldenhelix.com.
|
| |
| 17. |
Breiman, L. (2001) Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat. Sci.
16, 199–231.
|
| |
| 18. |
Stanton, D. T. (1999) Evaluation and use of BCUT descriptors in QSAR and QSPR studies. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
39, 11–20.
|
| |
| 19. |
Lam, R. L. H. (2001) Design and analysis of large chemical databases for drug discovery. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Waterloo.
|
| |
| 20. |
Yi, B., Hughes-Oliver, J. M., Zhu, L., and Young, S. S. (2002) A factorial design to optimize cell-based drug discovery analysis.
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
42, 1221–1229.
|
| |
| 21. |
Dragon, http://www.disat.unimib.it/chm/Dragon.
|
| |
| 22. |
Burden, F. R., and Winkler, D. A. (2000) A quantitative structure-activity relationships model for the acute toxicity of substituted
benzenes to Tetrahymena pyriformis using Bayesian-regularized neural networks. Chem. Res. Toxicol.
13, 436–440.
|
| |
| 23. |
Jones-Hertzog, D. K., Mukhopadhyay, P., Keefer, C. E., and Young, S. S. (1999) Use of recursive partitioning in the sequential
screening of G-protein-coupled receptors. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
42, 207–215.
<Occurrence Type="DOI"><Handle>10.1016/S1056-8719(00)00073-3</Handle></Occurrence>
|
| |
| 24. |
Young, S. S., Farmen, M., and Rusinko, A. III. Random versus rational: Which is better for general compound screening? http://www.netsci.org/Science/Screening/feature09.
|
| |