Springer Protocols: Abstract: Geometrical Docking Algorithms: A Practical Approach

Geometrical Docking Algorithms: A Practical Approach

By: Haim J. Wolfson², Ruth Nussinov³

Abstract

Full Text

Download PDF (155K)

The problem of docking of molecules displaying some level of flexibility is extremely important in computational structural biology.

Affiliation(s): (2) Computer Science Department, School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
(3) Laboratory of Experimental and Computational Biology, SAIC, Frederick, MD

Book Title: Protein Structure Prediction: Methods and Protocols

Series: Methods in Molecular Biology | Volume: 143 | Pub. Date: Aug-15-2000 | Page Range: 377-397 | DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-368-2:377

Subject: Protein Science

References

Download References

1.	Cherfils, J., Duquerroy, S., and Janin, J. (1991) Protein-protein recognition analyzed by docking simulations. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 11, 271–280.

2.	Cherfils, J. and Janin, J. (1993) Protein docking algorithms: simulating molecular recognition. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 3, 265–269.

3.	Lawrence, M. C. and Colman, P. M. (1993) Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 946–950.

4.	Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R., and Ferrin, T. (1982) A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 161, 269–288.

5.	Goodsell, D. S. and Olson, A. J. (1990) Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 8, 195–202.

6.	Jiang, F. and Kim, S. H. (1991) “Soft docking”: matching of molecular surface cubes. J. Mol. Biol. 219, 79–102.

7.	Wang, H. (1991) Grid-search molecular accessible surface algorithm for solving the protein docking problem. J. Comp. Chem. 12, 746–750.

8.	Shoichet, B. K. and Kuntz, I. D. (1991) Protein docking and complementarity. J. Mol. Biol. 221, 79–102.

9.	Walls, P. H. and Sternberg, M. J. E. (1992) New algorithm to model protein-protein recognition based on surface complementarity. J. Mol. Biol. 228, 277–297.

10.	Kasinos, N., Lilley, G. A., Subbarao, N., and Haneef, I. (1992) A robust and efficient automated docking algorithm for molecular recognition. Protein Eng. 5, 69–75.

11.	Katchalski-Katzir, E., Shariv, I., Eisenstein, M., Friesem, A. A., Aflalo, C., and Vakser, I. A. (1992) Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between protein and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 2195–2199.

12.	Norel, R., Fischer, D., Wolfson, H. J., and Nussinov, R. (1994) Molecular surface recognition by a computer vision based technique. Protein Eng. 7, 39–46.

13.	Norel, R., Lin, S. L., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. (1994) Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. Biopolymers 34, 933–940.

14.	Norel, R., Lin, S. L., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. (1995) Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: the critical role played by surface normals at well placed, sparse, points in docking. J. Mol. Biol. 252, 263–273.

15.	Fischer, D., Lin, S. L., Wolfson H. J., and Nussinov, R. (1995) A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J. Mol. Biol. 248, 459–477.

16.	Connolly, M. (1986) Shape complementarity at the hemoglobin α₁β₁ subunit interfaces. Biopolymers 25, 1229–1247.

17.	Helmer-Citterich, M. and Tramontano, A. (1994) PUZZLE: a new method for automated protein docking based on surface shape complementarity. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 1021–1031.

18.	Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., Meyer, E. F. Jr., Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., and Tasumi, M. (1997) The protein databank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112, 535–542.

19.	Norel, R., Lin, S. L., Xu, D., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. (1998) Molecular surface variability and induced conformational changes upon protein-protein association, in Structure, Motion, Interaction and Expression of Biological Macromolecules. Proceedings of the Tenth Conversation (Sarma, R. H. and Sarma, M. H., eds.), Adenine Press, Albany, NY, pp. 31–51.

20.	Janin, J., Miller, S., and Chothia, C. (1988) Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 204, 155–164.

21.	Peters, K. P., Fauck, J., and Frommel, C. (1997) The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria. J. Mol. Biol 256, 201–213.

22.	Nussinov, R. and Wolfson, H. (1991) Efficient detection of motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 10,495–10,499.

23.	Connolly, M. L. (1983) Analytical molecular surface calculation. J. Appl. Cryst. 16, 548–558.

24.	Lin, S. L., Nussinov, R. Fischer, D., and Wolfson, H. (1994) Molecular surface representation by sparse critical points. Proteins 18, 94–101.

25.	Lin, S. L. and Nussinov, R. (1996) Molecular recognition via the face center representation of molecular surface. J. Mol. Graphics 14, 78–97.

26.	Sandak, B., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. (1998) Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: insights from open to closed conformational isomers. Proteins 32, 159–174.

27.	Gerstein, M., Lesk, A. M., and Chothia, C. (1994) Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. Biochemistry 33, 6739–6749.

28.	DesJarlais, R. L., Sheridan, R. P., Dixon, J. S., Kuntz, I. D., and Venkataraghavan, R. (1986) Docking flexible ligands to macromolecular receptors by molecular shape. J. Med. Chem. 29, 2149–2153.

29.	Leach, A. R. and Kuntz, I. D. (1992) Conformational analysis of flexible ligands in macromolecular receptor sites. J. Comp. Chem. 13, 730–748.

30.	Knegtel, R. M. A., Antoon, C. R., Boelens, R., and Kaptein, R. (1994) Monty: a Monte Carlo approach to protein-DNA recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 318–324.

31.	Clark, K. P. and Ajay, (1995) Flexible ligand docking without parameter adjustment across four ligand receptor complexes. J. Comp. Chem. 16, 1210–1226.

32.	Welch, W., Ruppert, J., and Jain, A. N. (1996) Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chem. and Biol. 3, 449–462.

33.	Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., and Klebe, G. (1996) A fast flexible docking method using incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 261, 470–489.

34.	Jones, G., Willet, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A., and Taylor, R. (1997) Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 267, 727–748.

35.	Leach, A. R. (1994) Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 345–356.

36.	Jones, G., Willet, P., and Glen, R. C. (1995) Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J. Mol. Biol. 245, 43–53.

37.	Sandak, B., Nussinov, R., and Wolfson, H. J. (1995) An automated computer-vision and robotics based technique for 3-D flexible biomolecular docking and matching. Comp. Appl. BioSci. 11, 87–99.

38.	Sandak, B., Wolfson, H. J., and Nussinov, R. (1996) Hinge-bending at molecular interfaces: automated docking of a dihydroxyethylene-containing inhibitor of the HIV-1 protease, in Proceedings of the Ninth Conversation in Stereodynamics (Sarma, R. H. and Sarma, M. H., eds.), Adenine Press, Albany, NY, 233–252.

39.	Sandak, B., Nussinov, R., and Wolfson, H. J. (1996) Docking of conformationally flexible proteins, in Seventh Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching, Laguna Beach, CA, and Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, New York. 1075, 271–287.

40.	Sandak, B., Nussinov, R., and Wolfson, H. J. (1998) A flexible method for biomolecular structural recognition and docking allowing conformational flexibility. J. Co.

41.	Lengauer, T. and Rarey, M. (1996) Computational methods for biomolecular docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 402–406.

Comments (Loading...)

Post comment/View all comments