SpringerProtocols: Abstract: Comparative Genomic Hybridization on BAC Arrays

2. Comparative Genomic Hybridization on BAC Arrays

By: Bradley P. Coe², William W. Lockwood², Raj Chari², Wan L. Lam²

Abstract

Full Text

Download PDF (381K)

Alterations in genomic DNA are a key feature of many constitutional disorders and cancer. The discovery of the underlying regions of gene dosage has thus been essential in dissecting complex disease phenotypes and identifying targets for therapeutic intervention and diagnostic testing. The development of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) using bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) as hybridization targets has facilitated the discovery and fine mapping of novel genomic alterations allowing rapid identification of target genes.

In BAC aCGH, DNA samples are first labeled with fluorescent dyes through a random priming reaction with 100–400 ng of genomic DNA. This probe is then co-hybridized to an array consisting of BAC clones, either tiling the genome (˜50 kbp resolution) or spaced at intervals (e.g., 1 Mbp resolution). The resulting arrays are then imaged and the signal at each locus is compared between a reference and test sample to determine the copy number status. The DNA samples to be analyzed may be derived from either fresh, frozen, or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material, and sample requirements are currently significantly lower than those for oligonucleotide platforms due to the high probe-binding capacity of BAC clone targets (˜150 kbp) compared to oligonucleotides (25–80 bp). In this chapter, we describe in detail the technical procedure required to perform copy number analysis of genomes with BAC aCGH.

Affiliation(s): (2) British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Book Title: Microarray Analysis of the Physical Genome: Methods and Protocols

Series: Methods in Molecular Biology | Volume: 556 | Pub. Date: Feb-01-2009 | Page Range: 7-19 | DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-192-9_2

Subject: Genetics/Genomics

Key Words: CGH - array CGH - bacterial artificial chromosomes - genomics - gene dosage - DNA copy number

References

Download References

1.	Lockwood WW, Chari R, Chi B, Lam WL. (2006) Recent advances in array comparative genomic hybridization technologies and their applications in human genetics. Eur J Hum Genet. 14, 139–148.

2.	Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman F, Pinkel D. (1992) Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science. 258, 818–821.

3.	Albertson DG, Collins C, McCormick F, Gray JW. (2003) Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors. Nat Genet. 34, 369–376.

4.	Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW, Albertson DG. (1998) High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet. 20, 207–211.

5.	Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S, Nickolenko J, Benner A, Dohner H, Cremer T, Lichter P. (1997) Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 20, 399–407.

6.	Davies JJ, Wilson IM, Lam WL. (2005) Array CGH technologies and their applications to cancer genomes. Chromosome Res. 13, 237–248.

7.	Pollack JR, Perou CM, Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Pergamenschikov A, Williams CF, Jeffrey SS, Botstein D, Brown PO. (1999) Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 23, 41–46.

8.	Ishkanian AS, Malloff CA, Watson SK, DeLeeuw RJ, Chi B, Coe BP, Snijders A, Albertson DG, Pinkel D, Marra MA, Ling V, MacAulay C, Lam WL. (2004) A tiling resolution DNA microarray with complete coverage of the human genome. Nat Genet. 36, 299–303.

9.	Khojasteh M, Lam WL, Ward RK, MacAulay C. (2005) A stepwise framework for the normalization of array CGH data. BMC Bioinformatics. 6, 274.

10.	Neuvial P, Hupe P, Brito I, Liva S, Manie E, Brennetot C, Radvanyi F, Aurias A, Barillot E. (2006) Spatial normalization of array-CGH data. BMC Bioinformatics. 7, 264.

11.	Mc Sherry EA, Mc Goldrick A, Kay EW, Hopkins AM, Gallagher WM, Dervan PA. (2007) Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded clinical tissues show spurious copy number changes in array-CGH profiles. Clin Genet. 72, 441–447.

12.	Coe BP, Lee EH, Chi B, Girard L, Minna JD, Gazdar AF, Lam S, MacAulay C, Lam WL. (2006) Gain of a region on 7p22.3, containing MAD1L1, is the most frequent event in small-cell lung cancer cell lines. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 45, 11–19.

13.	Dabney AR, Storey JD. (2007) A new approach to intensity-dependent normalization of two-channel microarrays. Biostatistics. 8, 128–139.

14.	Dobbin KK, Kawasaki ES, Petersen DW, Simon RM. (2005) Characterizing dye bias in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics. 21, 2430–2437.

15.	Taylor S, Smith S, Windle B, Guiseppi-Elie A. (2003) Impact of surface chemistry and blocking strategies on DNA microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, e87.

16.	Zammatteo N, Jeanmart L, Hamels S, Courtois S, Louette P, Hevesi L, Remacle J. (2000) Comparison between different strategies of covalent attachment of DNA to glass surfaces to build DNA microarrays. Anal Biochem. 280, 143–150.

17.	Branham WS, Melvin CD, Han T, Desai VG, Moland .CL, Scully AT, Fuscoe JC. (2007) Elimination of laboratory ozone leads to a dramatic improvement in the reproducibility of microarray gene expression measurements. BMC Biotechnol. 7, 8.

18.	Fare TL, Coffey EM, Dai H, He YD, Kessler DA, Kilian KA, Koch JE, LeProust E, Marton MJ, Meyer MR, Stoughton RB, Tokiwa GY, Wang Y. (2003) Effects of atmospheric ozone on microarray data quality. Anal Chem. 75, 4672–4675.

19.	Fiegler H, Redon R, Carter NP. (2007) Construction and use of spotted large-insert clone DNA microarrays for the detection of genomic copy number changes. Nat Protoc. 2, 577–587.

Comments (Loading...)

Post comment/View all comments